Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-01 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1040 SB 100 Amendment No. 8 was not offered. Senator Kerttula offered Amendment No. 9 : Add a new section to read: "The sum of $1,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund for Department of Law to pay judgments and claims against the state for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993. Senator Kerttula moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 9. Senator Frank objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 9 failed. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 10 : Page 10, lines 16 - 17: Delete "$4,700,000" Insert "$6,000,000" Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 10. Senator Kelly objected. 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1041 SB 100 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 10 failed. Senators Lincoln, Adams offered Amendment No. 11 : Page 7, Line 20: Delete "$292,200" Insert "$492,000" Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 11: Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Absent: Kelly 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1042 SB 100 and so, Amendment No. 11 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 12 : Page 2, line 15: Delete "$138,400" Insert "$200,000" SB 100 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 12. Senator Frank objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 12 failed. Senator Zharoff offered Amendment No. 13 : Add a new section to read: "Sec. *. The sum of $90,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs for additional costs of the veterans' death gratuity program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993." 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1043 SB 100 Senator Zharoff moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 13. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 13 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 14 : Page 1, line 5: Delete ", not to exceed $250,000," Page 1, lines 8 - 10: Delete "reappropriated to the Office of the Governor for payment as a grant under AS 37.05.316 to Arctic Power, Inc., for promotion of the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas development." Insert "lapses into the general fund June 30, 1993." Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 14. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1044 SB 100 CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 14 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 15 : Page 2, lines 2 - 9: Page 2, lines 12 - 30: Page 3, lines 6 - 12: Page 3, lines 15 - 17: Page 3, line 29, through page 6, line 12: Page 7, lines 5 - 9: Page 7, line 17, through page 8, line 17: Page 8, line 31, through page 10, line 5: Page 10, lines 9 - 15: Page 10, lines 18 - 20: Page 10, line 24, through page 11, line 8: Delete all material. Renumber bill sections accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 15. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1045 SB 100 CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 3 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 15 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 16 : Section 3: Delete all material. Renumber bill sections accordingly. Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 16. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 16 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 16 failed. 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1046 SB 100 Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 17 : Page 1, Lines 5-10, Section 1: Delete all material Renumber bill sections accordingly. Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 17. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 17 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 17 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 17 failed. Senator Donley moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 9 for the purpose of declaring a possible conflict of interest and asked to be allowed to abstain from voting. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 9?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1047 SB 100 CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Rescind action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the Senate failed to rescind its action. Senator Adams offered Amendment No. 18 : Page 8, Line 21, Sec. 44: Delete "$100,000" Insert "$125,000" Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 18. Senator Frank objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1048 SB 100 and so, Amendment No. 18 failed. Senator Adams moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2. The question being: "Shall the Senate rescind its previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) am Second Reading Rescind action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the Senate failed to rescind its action. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 100(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Senator Adams objected. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 100(FIN) am be advanced to third reading?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-01 Senate Journal Page 1049 SB 100 CSSB 100(FIN) am Advance from Second to Third Reading? YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 100(FIN) am failed to be advanced to third reading.